The Saga of State ‘Amazon’ Laws: Reflections on the Colorado Decision
University of California, Berkeley - Boalt Hall School of Law
University of California, Davis - School of Law
July 17, 2012
State Tax Notes, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2012
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2111433
We analyze the Colorado district court’s decision in Direct Marketing Association v. Huber – a decision that permanently enjoined Colorado’s "Amazon" law. Had it not been enjoined, the Colorado law would have mandated information reporting by remote e-commerce vendors so that Colorado could levy its sales and use tax on the e-commerce purchases made by Colorado residents. We evaluate the applicability of the Tax (Anti-)Injunction Act and whether the Colorado statute and regulations should be reviewed as a tax or as a regulation. We also suggest alternative approaches that state legislatures might use in order to levy taxes on remote e-commerce transactions.
(Subsequent to the publication of this essay, the 10th Circuit reversed the Colorado district court’s opinion based on similar arguments to those forwarded in this essay. The U.S. Supreme Court is now scheduled to hear this dispute, in the case of Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl.)
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: tax, e-commerce, Amazon laws, injunction act, colorado, huberAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 18, 2012 ; Last revised: December 2, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds