Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2112261
 


 



AT&T Mobility and the Future of Small Claims Arbitration


Jill Gross


Pace Law School

June 1, 2012

Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 41, 2012

Abstract:     
Small claims arbitration has not received much attention from dispute system designers and scholars. Several coalescing developments require a reassessment of the small claims arbitration process: (1) the Supreme Court’s strong endorsement of the Federal Arbitration Act and arbitration as a favored dispute resolution mechanism, (2) the proliferation of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer products and services agreements, (3) the judicialization of arbitration, and (4) most recently, the Court’s condemnation, in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, which held that the FAA preempts a California rule that declared class arbitration waivers in consumer contracts unconscionable, of class arbitration as a procedural device to resolve aggregable yet arbitrable low dollar value claims. The article describes the primary features of the two options remaining for the Concepcions – small claims court and small claims arbitration, as well as their perceived advantages and disadvantages. The article also examines whether simplified arbitration is a fair method of resolving small arbitration claims, and explores other dispute resolution models for resolving small dollar value commercial disputes, including on-line dispute resolution, telephonic arbitration and a small claims arbitrator. The article concludes by urging dispute system designers to consider changing the default mechanism of arbitrating small claims cases from paper or “desk” arbitration to a live hearing before a small claims arbitrator.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: arbitration, small claims, dispute resolution, dispute system design

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2012 ; Last revised: December 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Gross, Jill, AT&T Mobility and the Future of Small Claims Arbitration (June 1, 2012). Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 41, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2112261

Contact Information

Jill Gross (Contact Author)
Pace Law School ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 456
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 182,972

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.296 seconds