Abstract

 


 



Ten-Step Guide to Oral Argument for Junior Attorneys


David A. Grenardo


Ave Maria School of Law

2010

San Francisco Daily Journal, June 2010

Abstract:     
Junior attorneys are often eager to step into court to argue. Before doing so, attorneys must understand what is necessary to argue effectively. A compelling oral argument must be persuasive, and it requires preparation and precision. This article provides a ten-step outline for oral argument that will enable a junior attorney to maximize the opportunity to argue in court and to represent the client’s interests to the best of his or her ability. It discusses, among other things, preparing counter-arguments, dealing with the judge, providing legal authority for the judge's ruling, avoiding legalease, making specific points during the argument, practicing the arguments, and being professional.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 1

Keywords: oral argument, persuasion, junior attorneys, professional

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2012 ; Last revised: July 23, 2012

Suggested Citation

Grenardo, David A., Ten-Step Guide to Oral Argument for Junior Attorneys (2010). San Francisco Daily Journal, June 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2114597

Contact Information

David A. Grenardo (Contact Author)
Ave Maria School of Law ( email )
1025 Commons Circle
Naples, FL 34119
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 70
Downloads: 12

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds