Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (77)



 


 



Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies


Emily L. Sherwin


Cornell University - Law School

2011

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2012
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-54

Abstract:     
This article is part of a symposium on the new Restatement (Third) or Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. I take up the problem of constructive trusts in bankruptcy. The Restatement takes the position that constructive trust claimants have automatic priority in insolvency situations over ordinary creditors. I argue that this unduly reifies a remedial construct that is useful for capturing unjust enrichment but does not always do so in cases of insolvency.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Constructive Trust, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Sherwin, Emily L., Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies (2011). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2012; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-54. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2115586

Contact Information

Emily L. Sherwin (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 139
Downloads: 35
Footnotes:  77

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.656 seconds