Citizens versus Bondholders
University of Virginia School of Law
July 1, 2012
Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 39, p. 787, 2012
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-42
Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2012-08
This Essay, written for a colloquium considering the effects of the recent financial crisis on local governments, asks whether bondholders or citizens are better monitors of municipal fiscal behavior and who should be charged with the risk of municipal default when cities experience financial distress. Should citizens feel the fiscal pain through tax hikes and service cuts or should bondholders suffer losses? This Essay argues that bondholders should be charged with the risk of municipal default, not because they are better monitors of local fiscal behavior, but because they are better bearers of financial risk. The Essay further considers whether this allocation of risk can help prevent municipal fiscal stress before it occurs and what the recent history of municipal defaults tells us about the politics of local fiscal crises. The Essay concludes by offering reasons for why municipalities have such low default rates as compared to their private-side counterparts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: municipal default, bankruptcy, cities, bondholders, local government, local economic developmentAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 23, 2012 ; Last revised: July 25, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds