Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2116614
 


 



Leniency and Severity in China’s Death Penalty Debate


Margaret K. Lewis


Seton Hall University - School of Law

June 1, 2011

Columbia Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2011

Abstract:     
China has implemented an initial wave of death penalty reforms that returned final review power of all capital cases to the Supreme People’s Court and reportedly significantly curbed executions. After reviewing recent legal developments concerning capital cases, this Article explores how the initial push to reduce use of the death penalty has given way to a more complex and nuanced debate over what factors should determine when the death penalty is appropriate. At this juncture in the reform trajectory, the dilemma of when to be lenient and when to be severe is particularly acute as public opinion chafes against a rapid decline in executions, especially when those treated leniently are affluent and/or politically well-connected.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: China, criminal law, death penalty, capital punishment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Lewis, Margaret K., Leniency and Severity in China’s Death Penalty Debate (June 1, 2011). Columbia Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2116614

Contact Information

Margaret K. Lewis (Contact Author)
Seton Hall University - School of Law ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 380
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 181,838

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.421 seconds