Nuclear Proliferation and the Risk of Nuclear Conflict: Experimental Tests
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
June 1, 2012
MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2012-20
The causes and prevention of nuclear war are critical to human survival but difficult to study empirically, as observations of nuclear war do not exist in the real world. Research on nuclear war has remained exclusively theoretical as a consequence. To circumvent the observational constraint, this article studies the relationship between proliferation and conflict using nuclear-option games that experimentally manipulate the number of players with a nuclear option in a laboratory setting. Results show that decisions are mostly peaceful in the two-player condition despite the existence of nuclear options with a relative first-strike advantage. However, a jump in the number of nuclear actors in the crisis interaction causes a significant increase in the individual propensity to use the nuclear option. The findings highlight an avenue of research that evaluates different mechanisms of nuclear war experimentally, pushing existing research beyond the theoretical domain.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36working papers series
Date posted: July 27, 2012 ; Last revised: May 24, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds