The New Relators: In-House Counsel and Compliance Officers
Seton Hall School of Law; Seton Hall University - Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law & Policy
July 26, 2012
Although not an entirely new phenomenon, recent False Claims Act filings have seen an uptick in former in-house counsel and compliance officers as qui tam relators. The False Claims Act does not preclude attorneys from becoming relators against their former clients, but the Code of Professional Conduct’s protection of confidential information acquired during the attorney-client relationship presents serious ethical challenges not only to the relator but to his or her counsel as well. This Comment reviews the applicable ethical rules as well as exceptions, concluding with suggestions for attorneys involved as relator, relator’s counsel, or counsel for the defendant.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Qui Tam Relator, False Claims Act, Rules of Pro/fessional Conduct, Confidential Information, Privileged, Crime-Fraud Exception, Claim or Defense Exception, Compliance Officer, Retaliation, Wrongful Discharge, Choice of Lawworking papers series
Date posted: July 27, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.640 seconds