Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (111)



 


 



Weighing the Constitutionality of State Immigration Verification Laws in the Wake of Arizona v. United States


Patrick J. Charles


Government of the United States of America - Air Force

July 30, 2012

Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, Vol. 27, 2013

Abstract:     
In the wake of Arizona v. United States, it is settled that state immigration verification laws like Section 2(B) are facially constitutional. At the same time, the Supreme Court did not foreclose that Section 2(B) could be preempted in terms of its application, nor did the Court shield the law from subsequent civil rights litigation. Thus, the question moving forward is under what circumstances, if any, can Section 2(B) be held unconstitutional moving forward? The question is important not only for unlawful immigration impacted states like Arizona, but to a number of states that have enacted similar laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: immigration, deportation, S.B. 1070, Arizona v. United States, immigration verfication, fourth amendment, unlawful immigration, illegal immigration

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 30, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Charles, Patrick J., Weighing the Constitutionality of State Immigration Verification Laws in the Wake of Arizona v. United States (July 30, 2012). Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, Vol. 27, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2119809

Contact Information

Patrick J. Charles (Contact Author)
Government of the United States of America - Air Force ( email )
Washington, DC
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 450
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 127,295
Footnotes:  111

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.313 seconds