Abstract

 


 



The Importance of Fault in Contract Law


Robert A. Hillman


Cornell Law School

August 1, 2012

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-34

Abstract:     
According to judicial opinions, the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, and some analysts, the reasons for failing to perform a contract, whether willful, negligent, or unavoidable, have little or no bearing in determining contract liability. Contract liability is said to be “strict,” meaning that the reasons for nonperformance are irrelevant in determining the injured party’s rights. In this Article, I argue that the reasons for failing to perform, which focus on whether non-performance is the promisor’s fault, are crucially important in the resolution of many, perhaps most disputes under contract law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: contract, fault, strict liability

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 2, 2012 ; Last revised: February 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hillman, Robert A., The Importance of Fault in Contract Law (August 1, 2012). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-34. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2121374 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2121374

Contact Information

Robert A. Hillman (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-4902 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 508
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 72,659
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds