Are International Judges Afraid of Science?: A Comment on Mbengue
Jose E. Alvarez
New York University School of Law
August 3, 2012
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 34, 2012
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-36
This article considers and critiques the proposition that international adjudicators are afraid or avoid determinations of scientific fact because of their discomfort with the technical expertise involved or the probabilistic judgments required of such fact-finding. It argues that this contention ignores the endemic fact-finding challenges faced by international tribunals generally, that the uncertainties attributed to “scientific” evidence are actually prevalent throughout the judicial process, that adjudicators are actually quite familiar with probabilistic judgments, and that structural constraints on courts and arbitrators and adjudicators’ own backgrounds affect how well fact-finding occurs, irrespective of whether it involves science. Finally, it suggests that to the extent international judges and arbitrators avoid confronting and answering head-on facts subject to scientific proof this may actually be a good thing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 3, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.734 seconds