Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2123481
 


 



Too Many Tiaras: Conflicting Fiduciary Duties in the Family-Owned Business Context


Karen E. Boxx


University of Washington School of Law

April 15, 2012

Houston Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 233-90, 2012
University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-12

Abstract:     
Family-owned businesses have been called the “backbone of the U.S. economy,” but passing control of a family business to the next generation is so complex that the majority of family businesses do not survive the transition. A common scenario that leads to problems is where owners want to leave the business to their children but only one child is interested in and capable of managing the business. A popular solution is to leave the interested child an equal share of the business, together with management control, and leave the other children interests in the business in trust, with the manager child as trustee. This raises difficulties for the manager–-trustee because the fiduciary duties of a trustee are much stricter than those of a business entity fiduciary. The children whose shares are in trust may also be disadvantaged if the manager–-trustee child is able to use the lower business fiduciary standard to reduce the value of the trust's’ interests in the business. The resulting uncertainty and litigation increase the likelihood that the business will not survive.

This Article first reviews the specific duties owed by trustees and by fiduciaries of the various business entity formats. It then analyzes the theories supporting imposition of fiduciary duty and the purposes of fiduciary duty in the various roles in order to determine what level of duty is essential to the trustee–-business fiduciary. Next it reviews case law where courts have had to identify the applicable fiduciary duty for a dual-role fiduciary. Finally, it argues for a new, hybrid duty that allows for the flexibility to take on risk as needed in the business context and that accommodates the fiduciary’'s personal interests in the business, but still recognizes the vulnerability of the trust beneficiary. A clearer level of duty tailored to this unique position would protect not only the business owners but all who benefit from the continued viability of the family business.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: family businesses, inheritance, estate planning, trusts, fiduciaries, dual-role fiduciaries

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 3, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Boxx, Karen E., Too Many Tiaras: Conflicting Fiduciary Duties in the Family-Owned Business Context (April 15, 2012). Houston Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 233-90, 2012 ; University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2123481

Contact Information

Karen E. Boxx (Contact Author)
University of Washington School of Law ( email )
William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
206-616-3856 (Phone)
206-685-4469 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,014
Downloads: 259
Download Rank: 64,349
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. An Economic Theory of Fiduciary Law
By Robert Sitkoff

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.578 seconds