Abstract

 
 

References (29)



 


 



A Comparison of the Beer and Penn Effect Models via Their Applications in the Renminbi Valuation


Zhibai Zhang


Zhaoqing University


International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 97, pp.138-154, September, 2012

Abstract:     
The behavioral equilibrium exchange rate (BEER) and the Penn effect models are compared via their applications on the valuation of the Renminbi (RMB). Considering the two models’ bases and applications, I conclude that, in time-series and cross-section data settings, the Penn effect model is the more reasonable or more robust model for currency valuation. In a panel data setting, the Penn effect model can be viewed as a special form of the BEER model; however, the latter includes many other forms that are different from the former. The criteria and methods of compari ng different model findings are given and used to compare typical misalignment results on RMB derived from the two models. According to the misalignment classification comparison, each model’s findings from the BEER model are only partly reasonable but each model’s findings from the Penn effect model are wholly reasonable. Thus, the latter is more reasonable than the former.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: behavioral equilibrium exchange rate model, Penn effect model, absolute purchasing power parity, Chinese Renminbi

JEL Classification: F31, F41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2012 ; Last revised: October 1, 2012

Suggested Citation

Zhang, Zhibai, A Comparison of the Beer and Penn Effect Models via Their Applications in the Renminbi Valuation. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 97, pp.138-154, September, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2124852 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124852

Contact Information

Zhibai Zhang (Contact Author)
Zhaoqing University ( email )
Zhaoqing, Guangdong 526061
China
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 101
Downloads: 11
References:  29

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.484 seconds