Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Ranking Schools: A Step Toward Increased Accountability or a Mere Discriminatory
Practice?


Ana Balcão Reis


New University of Lisbon - Faculdade de Economia

Carmo Seabra


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Luis C. Nunes


Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Faculdade de Economia

August 6, 2012

FEUNL Working Paper No. 567

Abstract:     
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discussion of the effects of published school rankings based on average scores obtained by students on national exams. We study the effectiveness of this (low-stakes) accountability mechanism; we analyze whether students react to these rankings, by moving in or out of high-schools according to their scores and examine the movements of closing of schools. Our results suggest that families react strongly to published rankings. We also look at the changes in the socio-economic background of students of poorly performing schools in order to evaluate whether the publication of rankings has increased inequality, as feared by many observers. According to our results, published rankings do in fact reinforce stratification by income.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: school accountability, school rankings

JEL Classification: I21, I28, H42

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Reis, Ana Balcão Balcao, Seabra, Carmo and Nunes, Luis C., Ranking Schools: A Step Toward Increased Accountability or a Mere Discriminatory Practice? (August 6, 2012). FEUNL Working Paper No. 567. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2124926 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124926

Contact Information

Ana Balcao Reis (Contact Author)
New University of Lisbon - Faculdade de Economia ( email )
Campus de Campolide
Lisboa, 1099-032
Portugal
Carmo Seabra
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Luis Catela Nunes
Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Faculdade de Economia ( email )
Campus de Campolide
Lisboa, 1099-032
Portugal
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 71
Downloads: 2
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds