Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2125243
 


 



Government Nonendorsement


Nelson Tebbe


Brooklyn Law School

March 7, 2013

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 648, 2013
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 287

Abstract:     
What are the constitutional limits on government endorsement? Judges and scholars typically assume that when the government speaks on its own account, it faces few restrictions. In fact, they often say that the only real restriction on government speech is the Establishment Clause. On this view, officials cannot endorse, say, Christianity, but otherwise they enjoy wide latitude to promote democracy or denigrate smoking. Two doctrines and their accompanying literatures have fed this impression. First, the Court’s recent free speech cases have suggested that government speech is virtually unfettered. Second, experts on religious freedom have long assumed that there is no Establishment Clause for secular ideas. So today there is a common belief that government is free to endorse secular ideas. But that belief is mistaken. In this Article, I argue that in fact the Constitution properly imposes a broad principle of government nonendorsement. That principle cuts across multiple provisions — including equal protection, due process, and free speech itself — and it shows how they work together to prohibit endorsements that abridge full and equal citizenship in a free society. Situations where official expression runs up against such limitations include racialized speech, electioneering, same-sex marriage exclusions, political gerrymandering, and messages concerning reproduction. Through analysis of these examples, I establish the requirement of government nonendorsement for the first time. Furthermore, I argue that appreciating the constitutional limits on official endorsement leads to new contributions to theoretical debates surrounding political morality, free speech, and religious freedom.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: government speech, free exercise, establishment clause, due process, equal protection, free speech, first amendment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2012 ; Last revised: November 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Tebbe, Nelson, Government Nonendorsement (March 7, 2013). Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 648, 2013; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 287. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2125243 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2125243

Contact Information

Nelson Tebbe (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
718.780.7960 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 589
Downloads: 97
Download Rank: 154,352

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.437 seconds