Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2127199
 


 



Litigating Federal Health Care Legislation and Interstices of Procedure


Wendy Perdue


University of Richmond

March 7, 2012

University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 691, 2012

Abstract:     
Although much has been written on the constitutionally of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, both before and after the Supreme Court decided National Fed. of Indep. Business v. Sebelius, 132 S.Ct. 2566 (2012), much less scholarly attention has focused on the procedural aspects of the litigation including jurisdiction, standing, ripeness, and severability. These procedural issues were the focus of the University of Richmond Law Review Symposium held in November 2011. The papers from that symposium highlighted several important themes including judicial restraint and the role of states as litigants.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obama Care

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 10, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Perdue, Wendy, Litigating Federal Health Care Legislation and Interstices of Procedure (March 7, 2012). University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 691, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2127199

Contact Information

Wendy Perdue (Contact Author)
University of Richmond ( email )
28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 56
Downloads: 1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds