Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2127646
 
 

Footnotes (185)



 


 



Positivism and Predisposition: The Forgotten Foundations of the Entrapment Doctrine


T. Ward Frampton


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

2013

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2013

Abstract:     
For the past eighty years, the entrapment doctrine has provided a legal defense for those facing federal prosecution, but only for those defendants lacking criminal “predisposition” prior to the government’s inducement. The peculiar contours of this doctrine have generated significant/academic debate, yet this scholarship has failed to explain why the entrapment doctrine developed as it did in the first instance. This Article addresses this gap by examining competing views on criminality and punishment in America during the doctrine’s emergence, highlighting the significant (though largely forgotten) impact of positivist criminology on the early twentieth-century legal imagination. Though positivism has long since been discredited as a criminological school, positivist theory helped shape the entrapment doctrine, and this intellectual context helps explain several features of the modern defense that have puzzled legal scholars. Unraveling these forgotten theoretical underpinnings thus provides a novel historical perspective on the modern doctrine’s formation, but it also offers a path forward for entrapment law today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 11, 2012 ; Last revised: October 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Frampton, T. Ward, Positivism and Predisposition: The Forgotten Foundations of the Entrapment Doctrine (2013). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2127646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2127646

Contact Information

T. Ward Frampton (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 397
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 187,818
Footnotes:  185

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds