Harlan on My Mind: Chief Justice Roberts and the Affordable Care Act
Timothy P. O'Neill
John Marshall Law School
August 10, 2012
3 California Law Review Circuit 170 (2012)
Chief Justice John Roberts' deciding vote to uphold the Affordable Care Act surprised many court-watchers. This Essay looks at Roberts' ties to certain members of the American legal elite in an effort to understand his vote.
Even before he was nominated to the Supreme Court, Roberts named Felix Frankfurter and the second John Marshall Harlan as two of his judicial models. Both exhibited aspects of James Bradley Thayer's conception of judicial self-restraint; indeed, Frankfurter fancied himself as the person who taught Harlan about Thayer's theories. Harlan, in turn, had practiced in the same law firm with the legendary Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly. Friendly considered Harlan one of the finest justices ever to serve on the Supreme Court. And to complete the circle, Friendly's law clerk in 1979 was a young man who had just graduated from Harvard Law School named John Roberts -- who, as noted, would later name Frankfurter and Harlan as his models.
This Essay examines the strands of judicial self-restraint that run through Roberts' recent decision. It compares this with similar approaches taken by Justice Harlan in several of his opinions. The Essay concludes by suggesting that the Frankfurter-Harlan-Friendly-Roberts connection may shed some light on the Chief Justice's view of the role judicial self-restraint should play in his work on the Supreme Court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Roberts, Thayer, Frankfurter, Harlan, Friendly, Posner, judicial self-restraint, legal theoryAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 12, 2012 ; Last revised: October 22, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds