Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2128803
 


 



Diversity May Be Justified


Anita Bernstein


Brooklyn Law School

August 13, 2012

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 64, 2012
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 290

Abstract:     
What about diversity is compelling enough to justify the hurts it inflicts on individuals? Judges, legislators, public opinion, and implementers of diversity programs in education and the workforce have defended their initiatives either with vague, anodyne, ill-founded paeans or, more often, with silence about what the rationale achieves. They have offered no justification of diversity.

From the premise that any state action that generates (or even risks) harm must be supported with reason, this Article undertakes the task of justification. What makes diversity unique among the rationales for affirmative action, the Article argues, is its power to simultaneously achieve two social goods — the repair of subordination and the strengthening of pluralism — that rest on independent and mutually constitutive jurisprudential bases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: affirmative action, antisubordination, Bakke, discrimination, diversity, Fisher, Grutter, justification, pluralism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 13, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, Anita, Diversity May Be Justified (August 13, 2012). Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 64, 2012; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 290. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2128803

Contact Information

Anita Bernstein (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 503
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 167,488

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds