Diversity May Be Justified
Brooklyn Law School
August 13, 2012
Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 64, 2012
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 290
What about diversity is compelling enough to justify the hurts it inflicts on individuals? Judges, legislators, public opinion, and implementers of diversity programs in education and the workforce have defended their initiatives either with vague, anodyne, ill-founded paeans or, more often, with silence about what the rationale achieves. They have offered no justification of diversity.
From the premise that any state action that generates (or even risks) harm must be supported with reason, this Article undertakes the task of justification. What makes diversity unique among the rationales for affirmative action, the Article argues, is its power to simultaneously achieve two social goods — the repair of subordination and the strengthening of pluralism — that rest on independent and mutually constitutive jurisprudential bases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: affirmative action, antisubordination, Bakke, discrimination, diversity, Fisher, Grutter, justification, pluralismAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 13, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.786 seconds