|
||||
|
||||
Developments in Family Law: The 2010-2012 TermsRobert LeckeyMcGill University - Faculty of Law October 15, 2012 (2012) 59 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 193-231 Abstract: This paper studies four family judgments decided by the Supreme Court of Canada: Kerr v. Baranow, on unjust enrichment and unmarried cohabitants; Schreyer v. Schreyer, on bankruptcy and provincial family law; and L.M.P. v. L.S. and R.P. v. R.C., both concerning the weight of agreements on variation of spousal support. Each of the judgments under consideration reveals a mixture of boldness and bashfulness. For example, the judges minimized their inventiveness in Kerr. The Court’s concept of the joint family venture in that judgment does not fit comfortably within unjust enrichment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40 Keywords: family law, Supreme Court of Canada, unjust enrichment, Kerr, Baranow, Schreyer, Miglin JEL Classification: K19 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 15, 2012 ; Last revised: December 12, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.609 seconds