Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130140
 


 



Developments in Family Law: The 2010-2012 Terms


Robert Leckey


McGill University - Faculty of Law

October 15, 2012

(2012) 59 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 193-231

Abstract:     
This paper studies four family judgments decided by the Supreme Court of Canada: Kerr v. Baranow, on unjust enrichment and unmarried cohabitants; Schreyer v. Schreyer, on bankruptcy and provincial family law; and L.M.P. v. L.S. and R.P. v. R.C., both concerning the weight of agreements on variation of spousal support. Each of the judgments under consideration reveals a mixture of boldness and bashfulness. For example, the judges minimized their inventiveness in Kerr. The Court’s concept of the joint family venture in that judgment does not fit comfortably within unjust enrichment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: family law, Supreme Court of Canada, unjust enrichment, Kerr, Baranow, Schreyer, Miglin

JEL Classification: K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2012 ; Last revised: December 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Leckey, Robert, Developments in Family Law: The 2010-2012 Terms (October 15, 2012). (2012) 59 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 193-231. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2130140 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2130140

Contact Information

Robert Leckey (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
514-398-4148 (Phone)
514-398-4659 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 393
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 153,319
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Unjust Enrichment and De Facto Spouses
By Robert Leckey

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds