|
||||
|
||||
The Nature of Responsibility of an Undertaking in Antitrust Proceedings and the Concept of ‘Criminal Charge’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human RightsAnna Błachnio-ParzychPolish Academy of Sciences - Institute of Legal Studies August 16, 2012 Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6, p. 35, 2012 Abstract: The present article aims to answer the question whether an undertaking’s responsibility (sometimes also referred to as liability) in an antitrust proceeding held by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish National Competition Authority) is of a criminal nature. The notion of ‘criminal charge’ is rather extensively construed in the jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights, which has formulated the criteria for criminal responsibility. Taking these criteria into account, the author postulates that the severe character of pecuniary sanctions imposed in Polish antitrust proceedings is an argument for the criminal character of the proceedings. Thus the guarantees of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights should be applicable to Polish antitrust proceedings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: criminal charge, criminal penalty, human rights, responsibility in antitrust proceedings, nature of the responsibility Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 17, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.563 seconds