|
||||
|
||||
A Behavioral Justification for Escalating Punishment SchemesMurat C. MunganFlorida State University - College of Law August 16, 2012 FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 602 FSU College of Law, Law, Business & Economics Paper Abstract: The standard two-period law enforcement model is considered in a setting where individuals rarely lose self-control or commit crime without first comparing expected costs and benefits. Where escalating punishment schemes are present, there is an inherent value in keeping a clean criminal record; a person with a record may unintentionally become a repeat offender if he fails to exert self-control, and be punished more severely. If the punishment for repeat offenders is sufficiently high, one may rationally forgo the opportunity of committing a profitable crime today to avoid being sanctioned as a repeat offender in the future. Therefore, partial deterrence can be achieved at a very low cost through the use of escalating penalties, providing a behavioral justification for punishing repeat offenders more severely.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19 Keywords: Lapse, weak will, repeat offenders, law enforcement, deterrence, escalating penalties JEL Classification: D03, K00, K10, K14, K40, K42 working papers seriesDate posted: August 17, 2012 ; Last revised: August 25, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.563 seconds