A Look at the Establishment Clause Through the Prism of Religious Perspectives: Religious Majorities, Religious Minorities, and Nonbelievers
Samuel J. Levine
Touro College - Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
87 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 775 (2012)
Touro Law Center Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 14-9
This article traces the Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence through several decades, examining a number of landmark cases through the prism of religious minority perspectives. In so doing, the Article aims to demonstrate the significance of religious perspectives in the development of both the doctrine and rhetoric of the Establishment Clause. The Article then turns to the current state of the Establishment Clause, expanding upon these themes through a close look at the 2004 and 2005 cases Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, Van Orden v. Perry, and McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky. The article concludes that the ongoing debates among Supreme Court Justices over the relevance of religious minority perspectives contribute to more general divisions that continue to characterize the current state of the Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37
Keywords: Religion, law, McGowan, Torcaso, Watkins, Maryland, Engle, Vitale, Schempp, Abington Township, Post-Lemon cases, religious diversity, jurisprudential division, Marsh, Lynch, Marsh v. Chambers, Chambers, Lynch v. Donnelly, Donnelly, Wallace v. Jaffree, Wallace, Jaffree, County of Allegheny, Allegheny
JEL Classification: K30,K39, K40, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 17, 2012 ; Last revised: March 3, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds