Why Priest-Klein Cannot Apply to Individual Issues in Patent Cases

Jason Rantanen

University of Iowa - College of Law

August 15, 2012

U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-15

The Priest-Klein hypothesis is commonly used to support the expectation of a fifty-percent success rate for patent holders on issues such as obviousness or inequitable conduct. As this essay explains, such a use of Priest-Klein is mathematically flawed. At best, the Priest-Klein hypothesis only applies to the selection of disputes, not the selection of individual issues. Due to the presence of multiple issues in patent cases, there is axiomatically no basis for inferring that a patentee would expect a fifty-percent chance of winning on each one. This essay supports its argument with theory and examples, demonstrating why application of the Priest-Klein hypothesis to individual issues - particularly in explaining or analyzing the results of empirical studies of doctrinal issue outcomes in patent law - is incorrect. This is not to say that such studies cannot yield useful and insightful results, but that conclusions about their meaning should not be based on deviations from a fifty-percent success rate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: patent, Priest-Klein, empirical

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 21, 2012 ; Last revised: March 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Rantanen, Jason, Why Priest-Klein Cannot Apply to Individual Issues in Patent Cases (August 15, 2012). U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2132810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2132810

Contact Information

Jason Rantanen (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,063
Downloads: 97
Download Rank: 205,336
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.703 seconds