Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2133042
 


 



Reflections on Tort and the Administrative State


Robert L. Rabin


Stanford Law School

Winter 2012

DePaul Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2012
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2133042

Abstract:     
This essay is my contribution to a festschrift dedicated to my scholarship on tort and the administrative state. The essay aims at identifying the central themes in my work and providing supporting commentary. I mark off for discussion three discrete areas that identify pathways to which I have returned repeatedly, although not chronologically, to explore different features of the landscape.

I begin with historical perspectives on the evolution of tort and the administrative state — essays in which I have been animated by an effort to better understand the underpinnings of common law doctrine and regulatory reform in earlier eras and to explore how those norms came to be transformed over time. As a second identifiable area, I turn to scholarship in which I have analyzed the comparative institutional efficacy of tort and regulation. Some of this writing has been aimed at exploring the regulatory limits that have been imposed (or proposed) on tort; in particular, through defense claims of regulatory compliance and tort preemption. Still other scholarly work of mine in this area has focused on the design of tort and administrative compensation/benefit schemes, particularly by examining, on various occasions, the ramifications of legislative no-fault plans. As a third discrete area, I address a set of concerns that thematically cluster in my scholarship: digging beneath the surface of tort doctrine. Here, my work comes from two quite different perspectives, one of which explores the tort system from a process vantage point and the other through a social policy prism. Closely related to this work, in a traditional vein of legal scholarship, I have at times pursued doctrinal analysis as an end in itself.

Both the tort system and the administrative state have grown by leaps and bounds over the past century. Correspondingly, the opportunities for scholarship evaluating these developments, as well as tracing their roots in earlier eras, know virtually no limits. This essay is meant to indicate some of the issues that have struck me as especially worthy of thematic exploration.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: torts, administrative state, tort doctrine, regulatory compliance, preemption

JEL Classification: K13, K23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Rabin, Robert L., Reflections on Tort and the Administrative State (Winter 2012). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2012; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2133042. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2133042

Contact Information

Robert L. Rabin (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-3073 (Phone)
650-725-0253 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 397
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 145,120

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds