Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law

Susanna Kim Ripken

Chapman University School of Law

August 22, 2012

Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 12-10

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court invalidated strict federal campaign finance laws and upheld the First Amendment right of corporations to use general treasury funds to support or oppose candidates in political elections. Shortly after the case was decided, a grassroots popular movement began calling for an amendment to the Constitution to establish that money is not speech and that human beings, not corporations, are the only “persons” entitled to constitutional rights. The concept of corporate personhood entered the national debate, causing many average Americans to question the legitimacy of corporations’ legal personhood status. Federal and state lawmakers have introduced several bills proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish corporate personhood, and hundreds of cities nationwide have passed municipal resolutions supporting such an amendment. Progressive groups that oppose corporate influence in politics disagree on whether the push for a constitutional amendment is a good idea. This article identifies several problems with the amendment strategy and suggests that the focus on personhood is misplaced. Legal history shows that the personhood label has long been arbitrarily applied in constitutional law cases, and, as a practical matter, personhood is largely indeterminate and sometimes irrelevant. More significantly, corporate personhood and power do not find their origin exclusively in constitutional law, but in long-standing corporate law doctrines and deeply entrenched norms. An attempt to curb corporate power in the political realm through a constitutional amendment does not address the systemic features of corporate law that allow corporate entities to amass great economic and political power. To ignore the tensions that corporate law raises in this regard is to miss the deeper source of corporate ascendance in the modern world.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: corporate personhood, constitutional personhood, corporate First Amendment rights, free speech, political speech, campaign finance, Citizens United, constitutional amendment, Move to Amend, social movement, popular movement,

JEL Classification: K20, K22, M14

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: August 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Ripken, Susanna Kim, Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law (August 22, 2012). Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 12-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2134465 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134465

Contact Information

Susanna Kim Ripken (Contact Author)
Chapman University School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,038
Downloads: 216
Download Rank: 77,950

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.329 seconds