Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2135098
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Exactitude in Defining Rights: Radio Spectrum and the 'Harmful Interference' Conundrum


Thomas W. Hazlett


George Mason University Dept. of Economics and School of Law

Sarah Oh


George Mason University - School of Law

August 14, 2012

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Forthcoming
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-55

Abstract:     
In the century since the Radio Act of 1912 initiated U.S. spectrum allocation rules, a precise definition of “harmful interference” – the control of which forms the rationale for regulation – has eluded policymakers. In one sense, that result is unsurprising; rights are always defined incompletely. In another sense, however, the regulatory system is dysfunctional, severely limiting the productive use of spectrum while locked down in years-long border disputes. These disagreements have, in turn, triggered calls to develop brighter lines and fuller engineering specifications of “harmful interference.” Yet, spectrum use rights featuring technically fuzzy borders, awarded in economically efficient bundles, generate robust market development. The key ingredients are (a) exclusive, flexible use rights; (b) frequency borders set via standardized edge emission limits; (c) large bundles of complementary rights, limiting fragmentation; and (d) fluid secondary trading, allowing mergers to end border disputes by eliminating borders. Regulators should focus less on delineating precise interference contours, and instead expeditiously distribute standard bandwidth rights to economically responsible agents, taking care to avoid undue fragmentation (and tragedy of the anti-commons). These lessons are illustrated in many episodes, including those involving reallocation of the broadcast TV band, the emergence of HD radio, the Nextel/public safety “spectrum swap,” and the ongoing WCS/SDARS dispute. Each instance reveals that economic incentives, not engineering complexity, drives productive coordination of radio spectrum use – or blocks it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: 3G, 4G, Adele Morris, attractive nuisance, cellular, data networks, DeVany, FCC, Federal Communications Commission, gridlock, Harold Demsetz, iPhone, Kaleb Sieh, LTE, licenses, licensees, mobile, Pierre De Vries, private property, Robert Matheson, Ronald Coase, TAS package, white spaces, wireless

JEL Classification: K21, K23, L41, L42, L43, L96

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 23, 2012 ; Last revised: December 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hazlett, Thomas W. and Oh, Sarah, Exactitude in Defining Rights: Radio Spectrum and the 'Harmful Interference' Conundrum (August 14, 2012). Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Forthcoming; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-55. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2135098 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2135098

Contact Information

Thomas W. Hazlett (Contact Author)
George Mason University Dept. of Economics and School of Law ( email )
George Mason School of Law
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-4244 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~thazlett/

George Mason Law School Logo

Sarah Oh
George Mason University - School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,135
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 124,752
Citations:  1
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Spectrum Value
By Coleman Bazelon and Giulia Mchenry

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds