Abstract

 


 



Expropriatory and Non-Expropriatory Takings Under International Investment Law


Jan H. Dalhuisen


King's College, University of London

Andrew T. Guzman


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

August 27, 2012

UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2137107

Abstract:     
The question of expropriation is at the heart of modern foreign investment law, yet remains an area of great uncertainty and ambiguity. Neither treaty law nor existing jurisprudence provides clarity on the questions of when government action amounts to an expropriation or what to do if does.

This Article provides a framework for approaching questions of expropriation that helps understand the key questions that must be addressed by investment tribunals or, for that matters, host countries and investors. We begin with the neutral category of takings, meaning any government action that negatively affects that value of an investment. We argue that a taking that is more than de minimis is an expropriation unless it promotes public welfare (which we also term “super public purpose”) or is incidental to normal government activity. Whether the taking is an expropriation or not, we must next ask if it is unlawful. As is well known, an expropriation is lawful if it is made for a public purpose, is non-discriminatory, satisfies due process, and if the required compensation is paid. Whether lawful or not, the taking must not violate the fair and equitable obligation. Finally, the Article considers the compensation owed (if any) under each of the four categories constructed above: a lawful expropriation, an unlawful expropriation, an unlawful non-expropriatory taking, and, of course, a lawful non-expropriatory taking.

Our approach to questions of expropriation cannot offer a simple and obvious result in every dispute. No discussion of the topic could do so. It does, however, guide the analysis and identify the key questions that must be answered in order to determine the legal implications of a governmental taking. In so doing, it offers a more coherent view of the international investment law of expropriation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: expropriation, foreign investment law

JEL Classification: K33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2012 ; Last revised: April 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Dalhuisen, Jan H. and Guzman, Andrew T., Expropriatory and Non-Expropriatory Takings Under International Investment Law (August 27, 2012). UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2137107. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137107 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2137107

Contact Information

Jan H. Dalhuisen
King's College, University of London ( email )
UT
Andrew T. Guzman (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-642-8074 (Phone)
510-642-3728 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.andrewguzman.net
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 686
Downloads: 201
Download Rank: 74,309

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.984 seconds