Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137119
 


 



Referee Recommendations


Ivo Welch


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

June 2, 2013


Abstract:     
This paper analyzes referee recommendations at the SFS Cavalcade, where a known algorithm matched referees to submissions, and at eight prominent economics and finance journals (ECMTA, JEEA, JET, QJE, IER, RAND, JF, RFS). The behavior of referees was similar in all venues. The referee-specific component was about twice as important as the common component. Referees differed both in their scales (some referees were intrinsically more generous than others) and in their opinions of what a good paper was (they often disagreed about the relative ordering of papers). My paper quantifies these effects.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

JEL Classification: A14

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2012 ; Last revised: June 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Welch, Ivo, Referee Recommendations (June 2, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137119 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2137119

Contact Information

Ivo Welch (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )
405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,583
Downloads: 782
Download Rank: 16,578

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds