Referee Recommendations

Ivo Welch

UCLA; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

June 2, 2013

This paper analyzes referee recommendations at the SFS Cavalcade, where a known algorithm matched referees to submissions, and at eight prominent economics and finance journals (ECMTA, JEEA, JET, QJE, IER, RAND, JF, RFS). The behavior of referees was similar in all venues. The referee-specific component was about twice as important as the common component. Referees differed both in their scales (some referees were intrinsically more generous than others) and in their opinions of what a good paper was (they often disagreed about the relative ordering of papers). My paper quantifies these effects.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

JEL Classification: A14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2012 ; Last revised: June 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Welch, Ivo, Referee Recommendations (June 2, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137119 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2137119

Contact Information

Ivo Welch (Contact Author)
UCLA ( email )
110 westwood plaza
Los Angeles, CA CA 90095-1481
United States
310-825-2508 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.ivo-welch.info
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,243
Downloads: 883
Download Rank: 16,359
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Preparing a Referee Report: Guidelines and Perspectives
By Jonathan Berk, Campbell Harvey, ...

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.390 seconds