Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137215
 


 



From Independence to Politics in Financial Regulation


Stavros Gadinis


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

August 27, 2012

101 Cal. L. Rev. 327 (2013)
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2137215

Abstract:     
Independent agencies have long dominated the institutional structure of financial regulation. But after the 2007-08 crisis, this Article argues, the independent agency paradigm is under attack. To monitor financial institutions more thoroughly and address future failures more effectively, the U.S. and other industrialized nations redesigned the framework of financial regulation. Post-2008 laws allocate new powers not to independent bureaucrats, but to elected politicians and their direct appointees.

To document this global paradigm shift, the Article examines the laws of fifteen key jurisdictions for international banking: the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Japan, Spain, Switzerland, Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Denmark, Canada, Australia, Mexico, and South Korea. This analysis points to a marked increase in the influence of elected politicians over banking. Politicians’ new powers extend not only over emergencies, but also over financial institutions’ regular operations. Politicians are now at the helm of innovative institutional arrangements, typically in the form of regulatory councils that encompass pre-existing independent agencies. In these councils, supermajority requirements and veto rights designate politicians as the ultimate decision-makers.

The Article shows how this paradigm shift resulted from the interplay of factors unique to the 2008 crisis and long run trends. The collapse of institutions in diverse areas of financial activity, including investment banks, insurance companies, and thrifts, created a sense that independent regulators as a class had failed. Concerns about regulatory capture, combined with disillusionment with the markets’ potential to self-correct, further undermined confidence in past paradigms. Developments in financial markets attracted great interest from ordinary Americans, who over the last two decades have increasingly relied on the financial system for their pension savings, housing credit, and other investments. Politicians could not remain as distant from financial regulation as in the past.

From a normative standpoint, politicians’ greater involvement in financial regulation is in line with calls for enhanced presidential control over independent agencies. Scholars have argued that the President’s stamp of approval will increase accountability and boost the legitimacy of hard choices, such as bank bailouts. However, greater political involvement might endanger financial stability, this Article argues. Electoral strategizing can influence politicians’ bailout choices, as incumbents might be particularly sensitive to upheavals as elections approach. Politicians are also under pressure from groups at ideological extremes, which often express a deep distrust to the financial system. In this climate, financial institutions are likely to lobby politicians more intensely. Thus, the risk of a financial catastrophe may now hinge upon considerations that have little to do with the health of the financial system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: financial crisis, Dodd-Frank, Federal Reserve, systemic risk, Treasury, President, executive

JEL Classification: K20, K22, K23, K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 28, 2012 ; Last revised: April 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Gadinis, Stavros, From Independence to Politics in Financial Regulation (August 27, 2012). 101 Cal. L. Rev. 327 (2013); UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2137215. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2137215 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2137215

Contact Information

Stavros Gadinis (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,677
Downloads: 415
Download Rank: 39,170

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds