|
||||
|
||||
The Ideological Divide: Conflict and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari DecisionEmily GrantWashburn University School of Law Scott A. HendricksonCreighton University Michael S. LynchUniversity of Kansas August 29, 2012 Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 3, p. 559, 2012 Abstract: This Article bridges a gap in existing literature by evaluating, from an empirical perspective, the impact of conflict among the lower courts on the Supreme Court’s decision to grant or deny a petition for a writ of certiorari. Specifically, this Article looks at the political ideology of the lower courts involved in a split of authority on federal law and compares those positions to the political ideology of the Supreme Court itself. This Article concludes that the ideological content of lower court opinions in a conflict case impacts the Supreme Court’s certiorari decisions in a statistically significant way, and thus sheds new light on the role lower court conflict plays in whether the Supreme Court’s exercise of its discretion to grant cert.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25 Keywords: court, ideology, certiorari, empirical methods, circuit splits, conflict JEL Classification: K19, K30, K39, K40, K49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 30, 2012 ; Last revised: February 5, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.578 seconds