'Fuzzy' Software Patent Boundaries and High Claim Construction Reversal Rates
Shawn P. Miller
Stanford Law School
February 7, 2013
Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 17, No. __, 2014
Bessen and Meurer (2008) theorize that a breakdown in notice of patent boundaries caused the patent litigation surge of the 1990s. They argue a prime source of this breakdown was the proliferation of software patents with particularly uncertain scope. In this paper I seek evidence that software patent scope is more uncertain by extending the empirical literature on claim construction reversal rates to determine whether the Federal Circuit has been more likely to find error in district court construction of software patents. Not only do I find that it has, since 2002 software patents account for forty percent of the difference between the Federal Circuit’s high claim construction reversal rate and its lower average reversal rate on all other patent issues. These results are cause for optimism because, in general, the application of existing claim construction law has been more predictable than many have feared. However, that optimism does not extend to software claim construction, which remains highly unpredictable.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: Patent, Software, Claim Construction, Uncertainty, Litigation
JEL Classification: D8, L00, O34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 31, 2012 ; Last revised: April 10, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.437 seconds