Can Self-Defense Justify Punishment?
University of San Diego School of Law
April 17, 2012
Law and Philosophy, Forthcoming
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 12-093
This piece is a review essay on Victor Tadros’s The Ends of Harm. Tadros rejects retributive desert but believes punishment can be justified instrumentally without succumbing to the problems of thoroughgoing consequentialism and endorsing using people as means. He believes he can achieve these results through extension of the right of self-defense. I argue that Tadros fails in this endeavor: he has a defective account of the means principle; his rejection of desert leads to gross mismatches of punishment and culpability; and he cannot account for punishment of inchoate crimes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: crime, desert, punishment, self-defense, attempts, use as a means
JEL Classification: K10, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 2, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds