The Rise of Private Authority and the Decline of Embedded Liberalism Across the OECD, 1982-2008

18 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2012

See all articles by Daniel P. Kinderman

Daniel P. Kinderman

University of Delaware - Political Science & International Relations

Date Written: August 1, 2012

Abstract

Does corporate authority complement or substitute for public regulation and institutionalized social solidarity? While there has been considerable interest in the use of private regulation in developing countries and weak governance zones, private regulation in developed countries has been understudied. A small but growing literature addresses the institutional determinants of private governance and corporate self-regulation in these countries. This literature has debated whether the self-regulation of firms functions as a complement or a substitute for the welfare state, trade unions, market correcting regulation and other institutions of what Ruggie called ‘embedded liberalism.’

This paper examines the relationship between private and public regulation in thirty capitalist democracies from the early 1980s until the late 2000s. It uses business-led Corporate Responsibility organizations to measure the state of private regulation at the country level. Their establishment dates and membership levels serve as proxies for the timing and quantity of private regulation. Independent variables include wage bargaining centralization, labor market regulation and employment protection, and industry regulation.

The results suggest that corporate self-regulation is associated with declining regulatory density – deregulation – for a variety of different variables. This confirms qualitative historical evidence that the emergence of business activity promoting self-regulation was deeply bound together with the rise of neo-liberal economic policies since the 1980s. During this period of deregulation and privatization, business leaders put out a distinct call for business to taken on new social responsibilities. The notion of responsible business and of business self-regulation played an important role in legitimating the institutional transformation of OECD economies toward neo-liberalism, as the institutions of the post-war compromise were breaking down. A recurring theme propagated by business leaders is the unmistakable idea of corporate responsibility as being a domain of voluntary activity, which must be free of state regulation.

The paper suggests that in OECD countries, private authority may be as much the source of our contemporary problems as part of their solution.

Keywords: varieties of capitalism, corporate social responsibility, liberalization, regulation, neoliberalism

JEL Classification: P16, P51

Suggested Citation

Kinderman, Daniel P., The Rise of Private Authority and the Decline of Embedded Liberalism Across the OECD, 1982-2008 (August 1, 2012). Paper prepared for the 2012 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. August 30, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2139895 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139895

Daniel P. Kinderman (Contact Author)

University of Delaware - Political Science & International Relations ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
503
Rank
687,410
PlumX Metrics