Adam Smith and Anti-Mathematics
Eric S. Schliesser
September 3, 2012
In this paper (written to honor the memory of Mark Blaug), I argue that in general Smith is distinctly reserved about the application of mathematics to political economy and even terrestrial physics. In particular, I argue that Smith’s strategy in these matters is an instance of what I call a “containment strategy.” By this I mean that Smith restricts the application of mathematics to a fairly limited domain of inquiry. Smith was not alone in such a containment strategy: we find instances of it in Locke, Buffon, whom he admired, and Mandeville. In the paper I explore evidence from Buffon and Locke. Containment strategies are part of a wider trend of eighteenth century “anti-Mathematics” (by which I mean expressed reservations about the authority and utility of mathematical sciences more widely) that can be traced back to Spinoza’s so-called “Letter on the Infinite.” In particular, the writings of Hume (especially Treatise 1.2) offer examples of more comprehensive strategies in anti-Mathematics. I argue that Smith draws on Hume's views on reasoning with proportions as suitable for political economy. Along the way, I offer a reconsideration of a common trope that Smith is some kind of Newtonian.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: mathematical economics, anti-Mathematics, David Hume, Adam Smith, Buffon
JEL Classification: B12, B41working papers series
Date posted: October 23, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.500 seconds