Derek E. Bambauer
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law
September 9, 2012
18 IEEE Internet Computing 26 (May/June 2013)
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-28
Internet censorship has evolved. In Version 1.0, censorship was impossible; in Version 2.0, it was a characteristic of repressive regimes; and in Version 3.0, it spread to democracies who desired to use technology to restrain unwanted information. Its latest iteration, Version 3.1, involves near-ubiquitous censorship by democratic and authoritarian countries alike. This Article argues that the new censorship model involves four changes: a shift in implementation to private parties; a hybrid approach mixing promotion of favored viewpoints with suppression of disfavored ones; a blend of formal mandates with informal pressures; and a framing of censorship using uncontroversial labels. It suggests a set of responses to censorship that cabin its abuses and push it towards more legitimate methods: focusing on governmental restrictions, insisting on labeling censorship as such, supporting distributed Internet governance, demanding a default right of access to information, and addressing corporate involvement.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Internet, censorship, cyberlaw, filtering, copyright, First Amendment, freedom of speech, intellectual property, IP, domain name, DNS, SOPA, PROTECT IP, governance, WCIT, WSIS, ISP, China, Australia, DMCA, Google, ICANN
Date posted: September 10, 2012 ; Last revised: June 20, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds