A Fundamental Enforcement Cost Advantage of the Negligence Rule over Regulation
Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
September 10, 2012
Harvard Law, Economics, and Business Discussion Paper No. 731
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 14-01
Regulation and the negligence rule are both designed to obtain compliance with desired standards of behavior, but they differ in a primary respect: compliance with regulation is ordinarily assessed independently of the occurrence of harm, whereas compliance with the negligence rule is evaluated only if harm occurs. It is shown in a stylized model that because the use of the negligence rule is triggered by harm, the rule enjoys an intrinsic enforcement cost advantage over regulation. Moreover, this advantage suggests that the examination of behavior under the negligence rule should tend to be more detailed than under regulation (as it is).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
JEL Classification: K13, K20, L5
Date posted: September 11, 2012 ; Last revised: March 12, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds