H. L. A. Hart’s Moderate Indeterminacy Thesis Reconsidered: In Between Scylla and Charybdis?
Imer B. Flores
Georgetown University Law Center; Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
October 15, 2011
Problema: Anuario de Filosofia y Teoria del Derecho, No. 5, 2011, pp. 147-173
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-162
In this article, in the context of the fiftieth anniversary of H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law, I reconsider the moderate indeterminacy of law thesis, which derives from the open texture of language. For that purpose, I intend: first, to analyze Hart’s moderate indeterminacy thesis, i.e. determinacy in “easy cases” and indeterminacy in “hard cases,” which resembles Aristotle’s “doctrine of the mean”; second, to criticize his thesis as failing to embody the virtues of a center in between the vices of the extremes, by insisting that the exercise of discretion required constitutes an “interstitial” legislation; and, third, to reorganize an argument for a truly “mean” position, which requires a form of weak interpretative discretion, instead of a strong legislative discretion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: discretion, indeterminacy, interpretation, legislation, formalism, rule-skepticism
JEL Classification: K00, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 11, 2012 ; Last revised: October 27, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.719 seconds