|
||||
|
||||
Stonewalling, Leaks, and Counter-Leaks: Scotus Ethics in the Wake of NFIB v. SebeliusSteven LubetNorthwestern University - School of Law Clare DiegelNorthwestern University - School of Law September 10, 2012 Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 12-23 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court is the only court in the United States without a clearly defined ethics code. In the wake of the controversy over possible leaks from justices’ chambers following the decision in NFIB v. Sebelius, and in light of legislation recently introduced in Congress, this paper suggests two reforms for the Supreme Court. First, the time has finally come for the Court to adopt a comprehensive Code of Conduct. Second, the Court should alter its current recusal practice – in which decisions are made exclusively by individual justices – and instead resolve disqualification motions by a vote of the full court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Keywords: SCOTUS, recusal, disqualification of judges, judicial ethics JEL Classification: K10, K40 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 17, 2012Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.921 seconds