Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146184
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Burdens of Proof


Ronald J. Allen


Northwestern University Law School

July 30, 2012

Evidence Science, Forthcoming
Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 12-17
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper 12-25

Abstract:     
The conceptual foundations of burdens of proof are examined, and the unified theory of evidentiary devices derivable from those foundations is explicated. Both the conceptual foundations and the unified theory generated are shown to rest on questionable assumptions about conventional probability theory. The resulting analytical difficulties are analyzed. Inference to the best explanation and the relative plausibility theory are examined as potentially providing the foundation to a superior conceptualization of the burden of proof.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: evidence, epsteimology, burdens of proof, persuasion, production, trials, probability theory, inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2012 ; Last revised: September 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald J., Burdens of Proof (July 30, 2012). Evidence Science, Forthcoming; Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 12-17; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper 12-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146184

Contact Information

Ronald Jay Allen (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 485
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 105,102
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.296 seconds