Citations (3)



Burdens of Proof

Ronald J. Allen

Northwestern University Law School

June 10, 2013

Journal of Law, Probability and Risk, Forthcoming
Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 12-17
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper 12-25

The conceptual foundations of burdens of proof are examined, and the unified theory of evidentiary devices derivable from those foundations is explicated. Both the conceptual foundations and the unified theory generated are shown to rest on questionable assumptions about conventional probability theory. The resulting analytical difficulties are analyzed. Inference to the best explanation and the relative plausibility theory are examined as potentially providing the foundation to a superior conceptualization of the burden of proof.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: evidence, epsteimology, burdens of proof, persuasion, production, trials, probability theory, inference to the best explanation, relative plausibility

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2012 ; Last revised: April 29, 2014

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald J., Burdens of Proof (June 10, 2013). Journal of Law, Probability and Risk, Forthcoming; Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 12-17; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper 12-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146184

Contact Information

Ronald Jay Allen (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 991
Downloads: 222
Download Rank: 92,825
Citations:  3
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Conceptual Challenge of Expert Evidence
By Ronald Allen

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.282 seconds