The Morrison Case as a Window to Institutional Investors’ Motives in Securities Class Actions
Harvard University, Law School, Students
April 20, 2012
A growing body of legal literature suggests that securities litigation in the United States has little economic benefit, both from the perspective of compensation and with respect to deterrence. In light of the costs entailed with securities class actions and the transfer of losses to innocent group of shareholders, one would expect that financial institutions would seek to limit the scope of these suits. However, a recent study conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to the Morrison case reveals that the inclination of institutional investors is quite the opposite. The paper analyzes the puzzling comments of institutional investors to the SEC’s study and suggests possible explanations to their support of broader class action regime.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: class actions, securities class actions, securities litigation, financial institutions, Morrison, compensation, deterrence, conduct and effect test, transactional test, Dodd Frank Act, fiduciary duties, fairness, behavioral economics
Date posted: September 14, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds