Structural Credit Risk Models: Endogenous versus Exogenous Default

Michael B. Imerman

Lehigh University; Princeton University

January 25, 2012

This article reviews structural credit risk models. Special emphasis is on the distinction between endogenous default versus exogenous default and the economic implications of the different assumptions. It is argued that models with endogenous default provide more insight into the default process. On the other hand, assuming exogenous default gives the flexibility to include certain features that are observed in actual credit markets.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Structural credit risk models, Default probability, Bond pricing, Credit spreads

JEL Classification: G00, G12, G33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 16, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Imerman, Michael B., Structural Credit Risk Models: Endogenous versus Exogenous Default (January 25, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146780 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2146780

Contact Information

Michael B. Imerman (Contact Author)
Lehigh University ( email )
Bethlehem, PA 18015
United States
610-758-6380 (Phone)
Princeton University ( email )
Sherrerd Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
609-258-1889 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,007
Downloads: 283
Download Rank: 71,672

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds