Citations (1)


Footnotes (15)



Amatory Jurisprudence and the Querelle des lois

Peter Goodrich

Yeshiva University - Cardozo Law School

March 2000

Cardozo Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper. No. 001

It is my view, and here, no doubt, I am pre-empting my conclusion, that what literary and feminist historicism recognizes as the querelle des femmes, the debate as to the status and political role of women, is in fact underpinned and motivated by a much less explicit, yet nonetheless portentous, querelle des lois. The querelle des femmes, in other words, was always a polemic as to the legal status of women, as to their definition and role in theology and jurisprudence, canon and civil law. More than that, however, what the recovery of amatory jurisprudence can help to show is that the querelle des femmes was predicated upon a conflict of jurisdictions and at base addressed the primary political question of which law, masculine or feminine, that of amity or fraternity, of Venus or polity, of love or regality, was to govern.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Goodrich, Peter, Amatory Jurisprudence and the Querelle des lois (March 2000). Cardozo Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper. No. 001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=214688 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.214688

Contact Information

Peter Goodrich (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Cardozo Law School ( email )
Brookdale Center
55 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
United States
(212) 790-0484 (Phone)
(212) 790-0205 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,137
Downloads: 180
Download Rank: 125,637
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  15

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds