Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146934
 


 



Geoengineering and Climate Management: From Marginality to Inevitablity


Jay Michaelson


Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Brown University - Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior

December 14, 2010

Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 221, Winter 2010

Abstract:     
In 1998, when I wrote the first law review article advocating Geoengineering as a climate change mitigation strategy, Geoengineering was both unknown and unpopular. Twelve years later, the political economy of Geoengineering – or as I prefer to call it, Climate Management (CM) – has shifted, precisely because the conditions I outlined in 1998 have stayed so strikingly the same. Then, I argued that the lack of political will, absence, complexity, and sheer expense of climate change mitigation made meaningful preventive measures, i.e. cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, extremely difficult to undertake. After a decade of obfuscation and misinformation by powerful political actors, the case seems stronger than ever.

Today, while CM remains at the margins of our popular political discourse, there has been an explosion of scientific and policy analyses. Solar Radiation Management (SRM: increasing the concentration of sulfur dioxide in the upper atmosphere) and Ocean Iron Fertilization (OIF: seeding gigantic phytoplankton carbon sinks in the oceans by fertilizing them with iron) have both been explored and advanced by credible scientists, scholars, and even entrepreneurs. Additionally, CM has been tentatively explored by conservative think-tanks and pundits – to the horror of environmentalists.

Yet the mere fact that conservatives support Geoengineering should not, in itself, cause liberals and greens to oppose it. Supporting CM should give any environmentalist pause, both because of its riskiness and because so many of our political foes support it. But CM is a climate change strategy that, unlike regulation, might actually stand a chance of becoming reality. It is the only approach to climate change that can act as a compromise between liberals and libertarians, greens and browns. As climate change becomes ineluctable, geoengineeering becomes inevitable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: climate change, greenhouse effect, geoengineering, Newt Gingrich, Paul Crutzen, climate management, international law, environmental law

JEL Classification: K32, K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 16, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Michaelson, Jay, Geoengineering and Climate Management: From Marginality to Inevitablity (December 14, 2010). Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 221, Winter 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2146934

Contact Information

Jay Michaelson (Contact Author)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem ( email )
Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, IL 91905
Israel
Brown University - Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior ( email )
Providence, RI 02912
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 691
Downloads: 82
Download Rank: 179,205

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds