Misadventures of An Irresponsible Investor

Jack Gray

University of Technology Sydney (UTS)

September 17, 2012

Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012

The ESG movement is nudging toward an unhealthy state of political correctness, one that brooks no criticism (and there is much, but mostly sotto voce). Boards spend excessive time on ESG relative to any expected benefits for the principals; managers cynically sign up to UNPRI else their business suffers; while principals, when given a choice, eschew the option. Nonetheless, ESG raises important questions about the very purpose of fiduciary investing, especially whether a pension fund has any social responsibility beyond generating the greatest risk-adjusted return for its beneficiaries. Jane Ambachtsheer, Stephen Davis, and Keith Johnston were invited to respond to Gray’s views. Their comments follow immediately after this article.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: ESG, Pension Fund, Social responsibility, Sole Purpose Test, Sustainability

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Gray, Jack, Misadventures of An Irresponsible Investor (September 17, 2012). Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2147770 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2147770

Contact Information

Jack Gray (Contact Author)
University of Technology Sydney (UTS) ( email )
15 Broadway, Ultimo
PO Box 123
Sydney, NSW 2007
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,055
Downloads: 304
Download Rank: 64,777

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds