Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148449
 


 



Misrepresentation: The Restatement's Second Mistake


Stephanie R. Hoffer


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

September 18, 2012

Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 173

Abstract:     
The contract defenses of mistake and misrepresentation, while conceptually distinct in theory, contain an inefficient amount of overlap in practice. This is because a misrepresentation of one party, when believed, results in a mistaken belief of the other. Each produces a failure of consent resulting from at least one party’s misconception of the facts, and each may result in rescission coupled with restitution. The coextensiveness of the defenses suggests that, absent an overriding normative justification, the legal test and remedy should be the same for each. Such a normative justification exists only in the case of fraudulent misrepresentation which, unlike mistake or non-fraudulent misrepresentation, involves the intentional infliction of a dignitary harm. In such cases, punishment and deterrence are appropriate normative goals.

Because punishment and deterrence are best achieved through provision of a punitive remedy rather than through determination of the remedy’s availability, they present no impediment to the adoption of a single defense in lieu of separate defenses of mistake and misrepresentation. Furthermore, punishment and deterrence are not fully achieved by the commonly available remedy of rescission coupled with restitution, which may impose reputational cost but leaves the wrongdoer in a financial position no worse than if fraud had not been committed. Accordingly, this Article recommends the adoption of a single defense of misconception coupled with a grant of discretion to courts for punitive damages in cases of fraud. Eliminating separate defenses and allowing an expanded remedy on the basis of intentionally false assertions would promote simplicity, efficiency, and predictability while buttressing the unique role of the fraud defense in contract law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: contract, mistake, misrepresentation, fraud, scienter, risk allocation

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K12

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 18, 2012 ; Last revised: February 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hoffer, Stephanie R., Misrepresentation: The Restatement's Second Mistake (September 18, 2012). Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 173. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148449 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2148449

Contact Information

Stephanie R. Hoffer (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 682
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 127,333

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds