Corporate Liability Under Customary International Law
William S. Dodge
University of California Hastings College of the Law
43 Georgetown Journal of International Law 1045 (2012)
UC Hastings Research Paper No. 7
This contribution to a symposium on Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. examines two ways of looking at the question of corporate liability under customary international law. It argues that the Second Circuit was wrong to ask whether a “norm of corporate liability” exists in the abstract and that the proper question is whether the particular norm at issue — torture, for example — applies to juridical persons. The essay notes that all of the norms actionable under the Alien Tort Statute prohibit certain acts, irrespective of the perpetrator, and explains that state practice applying norms to natural persons may generate customary international law binding on juridical persons unless there is some difference between natural and juridical persons relevant to the norm.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: Alien Tort Statute, Kiobel, Corporate Liability, Customary International LawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 22, 2012 ; Last revised: December 3, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds