Wyeth v. Levine and Its Implications
Stanford University Law School
May 11, 2009
Product Safety & Liability Report (BNA), Vol. 37, pp. 550-558, 2009
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-138
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. Levine sharply limited the availability of implied preemption as a defense in pharmaceutical cases. In this Analysis & Perspective, attorney Brian Wolfman discusses the decision and its implications for prescription drug litigation as well as litigation in other areas that are regulated by the federal government.
After Wyeth, Wolfman says, a defendant in a prescription drug case must demonstrate a ‘‘tight fit between the labeling change proposed by the manufacturer (and rejected by the FDA) and the labeling change that the plaintiff contends would have prevented her injuries.’’ Moreover, he says, in light of Wyeth, agency claims of preemption with respect to other products or services are likely to be subject to increased judicial scrutiny, and it is unlikely that these claims will be accorded substantial deference unless they are tethered to a congressional authorization regarding preemption.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Wyeth v. Levine, FDA, preemption, pharmaceutical cases, Supreme Court, CBE regulation, drug labeling
JEL Classification: K00, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 22, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds