Abstract

 


 



The Normative Fallacy Regarding Law’s Authority


Arie Rosen


New York University School of Law

August 28, 2012

Wil Waluchow and Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law, Oxford University Press, 2013, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
The philosophical treatment of socio-political concepts is susceptible to a methodological fallacy, consisting of an illicit move from statements in moral theory to statements about social and political facts. This fallacy — the normative fallacy — can be found in legal philosophy as well. In this essay I discuss the normative fallacy regarding law’s authority, criticize Raz’s theory of de facto authority as committing this fallacy, and consider the importance of law’s de facto authority (which can be quite different from its moral, rightful authority) to legal philosophy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: general jurisprudence, Raz, authority, normative fallacy, de facto, legitimate, rightful, practical matrix

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2012 ; Last revised: November 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Rosen, Arie, The Normative Fallacy Regarding Law’s Authority (August 28, 2012). Wil Waluchow and Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law, Oxford University Press, 2013, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150715

Contact Information

Arie Rosen (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 468
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 113,539

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds