Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150863
 


 



Testing the Effects of Striker Replacement and Employer Implementation of Final Offers on Employer and Union Bargaining Power


Ellen Dannin


Penn State Law

Terry Wagar


Saint Mary's University, Canada

Gangaram Singh


San Diego State University - Department of Management

Michelle Dean


San Diego State University - Management Department

September 23, 2012

Penn State Law Research Paper No. 24-2012

Abstract:     
Many sorts of quantitative and qualitative empirical research are regularly used to answer questions related to work and workplace issues. However, some issues involving human behavior may be difficult to capture using standard empirical methods. Common barriers include access to people or information; problems with accurate or honest reporting; behavior that occurs over long periods of time; cost; and ethical barriers as to research using human subjects.

Important information related to collective bargaining can be difficult to collect for all of these reasons. Participants in collective bargaining may not want outsiders present for all or critical parts of negotiations. They may not be candid about motives or actions, or they may be honest but not fully self-aware as to motives or actions. Bargaining sessions may be long and extend over months or years. In the case of gathering information about collective bargaining within the larger union-employer-employee contexts may require decades of access and involvement. As a result, costs in terms of time and funding and other issues may rule out examining certain sorts of questions using actual participants engaged in collective bargaining.

Thus, one important area that would benefit from empirical research – testing the effects of law and proposals for law reform in general and collective bargaining law reform in particular – has so many of these problems that many important issues cannot be tested using standard methods. In addition, testing law reform proposals requires gathering data on actions that have not yet happened.

Simulations provide one useful way to overcome many of these problems. In effect, simulations create a law reform laboratory. Of course, simulations are only useful if they are reflect reality. This article examines evidence as to participants’ actions in a simulation used to test various iterations of laws governing how collective bargaining impasses are to be resolved and whether those actions sufficiently mirror those of employer and union negotiators as to provide reliable data on the likely effects of law reform.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: labor, collective bargaining, negotiations, unions, employers, simulations, experimental economics

JEL Classification: C9, C91, C92, J3, J38, J5, J51, J52, J53, J58, K31

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2012 ; Last revised: October 31, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dannin, Ellen and Wagar, Terry and Singh, Gangaram and Dean, Michelle, Testing the Effects of Striker Replacement and Employer Implementation of Final Offers on Employer and Union Bargaining Power (September 23, 2012). Penn State Law Research Paper No. 24-2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150863 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2150863

Contact Information

Ellen Dannin (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
113 Beam Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
Terry Wagar
Saint Mary's University, Canada
923 Robie Street
Halifax, B3H 3C3
Canada
Gangaram Singh
San Diego State University - Department of Management ( email )
5500 Campanile Drive
San Diego, CA 92182-8230
United States
619-594-2201 (Phone)
619-594-3272 (Fax)
Michelle Dean
San Diego State University - Management Department
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 226
Downloads: 31

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds